Sunday, February 24, 2013
Happy Birthday Princess Maria Gabriella
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
King Carlo Emanuele III, RIP
It was on this day in 1773 that King Carlo Emanuele III, staunch ally of the Empress Maria Theresa, defender of Cuneo and the victor of Assietta passed from this life. A clever statesman and heroic soldier, he is still remembered today.
Monday, February 18, 2013
Italian Libya
The relationship between Libya and Italy has known equal extremes of good and bad. Since the arrival, or more accurately the return, of Italian power to north Africa there was a period of small-scale but continuous guerilla warfare which was ended only by some fairly harsh measures (though certainly not unprecedented ones). Following that, however, Libya became a model colony with generally good relations between the Italian and non-Italian populations. Modern port facilities, infrastructure and cities were built up and advanced methods of agriculture introduced by Italian settlers improved the local economy. Libyan natives were recruited into the Italian military and even formed some very effective and elite units. After World War II, there would be another round of extreme hostility (though without actual bloodshed) followed by another period of reconciliation, albeit of a tense and often false variety. Although it is not a subject that is that well known, a great deal of what people think they know about it is not entirely accurate. Many have heard only one side of the story of Italian Libya or have seen simply the “Hollywood” version without knowing any of the actual facts. Few people, for instance, probably know that Libya itself was an Italian invention. Prior to the Italian colonial period there was no such country on any map.
![]() |
| Italian sailors landing in Tripoli |
![]() |
| Italian troops entrenched near Tripoli |
![]() |
| Arms of Italian Libya, EF |
![]() |
| General Graziani inspecting Libyan troops |
![]() |
| Omar Mukhtar (left) and General Badoglio (center) |
![]() |
| The Marble Arch, later destroyed by Gaddafi |
Friday, February 15, 2013
The Popes and the Savoy
King Vittorio Emanuele III and family with Pope Pius XII
Prince Vittorio Emanuele and Prince Emanuele Filiberto with Pope John Paul II
King Umberto II with Pope Paul VI
King Umberto II and Prince Vittorio Emanuele with Pope Paul VI
King Umberto II and Pope John Paul II
Monday, February 11, 2013
Papa Benedetto XVI to Abdicate
It was announced today that Benedetto XVI, Bishop of Rome and Supreme Pontiff will abdicate the Petrine throne at the end of this month. Such a thing has not be done for many hundreds of years and even then it was the cause of great controversy. Already the preparations are being made for the next conclave to elect a new pontiff. The news took everyone by surprise as, despite the weakening that comes naturally to a man of his age, the Pope is still able to get around and still has a very sharp mind. He has done invaluable work in reminding people what is important, nudging the Church back in a more traditional direction and yet has broken with tradition in a big way with this announcement. It remains to be seen how Benedetto XVI will be remembered. Will he be known to history as the Pope who upheld traditional teaching or the Pope who quit? The speculation has also already begun about who will be elected next. Everyone seems concerned with "firsts". Will we see the first "Black" pope? The first Canadian pope? Perhaps even the first American pope? Are the days of Italian pontiffs being the norm gone forever? As the Pope is first the Bishop of Rome it does not seem out of order to me that Italians have historically been chosen but, as the news of today shows, my views are certainly not those of the majority.
Saturday, February 9, 2013
The Disaster of the 49 Roman Republic
It was on this day in 1849 that the "New Roman Republic" was established by the radical party of Giuseppe Mazzini with the help of some "muscle" provided by Giuseppe Garibaldi. The Pope, Blessed Pius IX, who had previously ruled Rome and central Italy was driven from his palace, forced to escape disguised as a simple priest, to the safety of Gaeta in the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies. The Pope had previously encouraged liberalism and Italian solidarity but was horrified by the assassination of his Justice Minister in the more progressive government he had set up at the instigation of the republicans. People also demanded a declaration of war from the Pope against the Austrian Empire, which he was not about to do and so he finally escaped as there is little doubt that his life may have been in danger. In his absence a totally secular government was established under the leadership of Mazzini who enacted total freedom of religion (which usually ends in a muddled lack of respect for all religions as we see today) but which also tried to placate the Pontiff with promises that his rule of the Catholic Church would not be interfered with. Of course, the Pope was not about to believe that and after all that had happened to him, with his own throne being effectively taken from him, Blessed Pius IX immediately did a complete political turnaround -going from being known as a "liberal Pope" to the strictest reactionary, which he is probably best known as still today.
The New Roman Republic was a disaster for everyone involved and pleased no one except for the radical anti-clerical revolutionary republicans. It was certainly no great step forward for those legitimate Italian nationalists who wanted unity and independence for Italy. For the Pope, it should go without saying, it was a huge disaster and forced him to put himself totally at the mercy of forces that were not the most reliable. There was little the Kingdom of the Two-Sicilies could do but the Spanish sent over an army but under the command of a general not known for being a staunch conservative. The real push came from France and President Louis Napoleon Bonaparte who would soon declare himself Emperor of the French like his famous great-uncle. Given the history associated with the Bonaparte name, the Pope could not have felt entirely secure being given help from such a quarter and in fact his general, Charles Oudinot, was such a staunch republican himself that he later broke with Napoleon III when he restored the French Empire. France, initially, was also willing to make a deal with Mazzini to arrive at some accommodation that would allow him and the Pope to share power but, as we know, the republican government would not hear of it and demanded war with France.
Mazzini didn't want this, as he hoped to befriend republican France, and he held Garibaldi back when his army actually gave the French a sound drubbing and sent them retreating back to the coast. However, it was only a temporary calm before a greater storm. More French troops were rushed to Italy and the result was a march on Rome that Garibaldi and his volunteers could not stop (Garibaldi himself eventually took refuge in San Marino). The New Roman Republic was destroyed, the French took control of the area and declared papal rule restored. The Pope did not immediately return however because of Napoleon urging him to institute a secular government and adopt the 'Code Napoleon' as the basis for law. The Pope was worried that he might have just exchanged Mazzini for Bonaparte in being master over him. He did, of course, finally return but he would have to depend on the presence of French troops from then on to maintain his rule over Rome and the surrounding area.
The entire episode of the New Roman Republic was a terrible waste. It clearly demonstrates the short-sighted nature of the revolutionary republicans. They accomplished nothing other than creating a religious divide in the country and inviting more invasions by more foreign troops who remain on Italian soil for several decades to come. The better plan would have been what was proposed later by King Vittorio Emanuele II; an Italian army to guarantee the security of the Pope and a coalition of all Italian states to create a stronger union. The New Roman Republic accomplished nothing, it fell and only made things worse for the ordinary Romans, it increased tensions with the Catholic Church and the national movement and it prompted a French intervention that would keep Rome cut off from the rest of Italy for the next thirty years. The lip-service given to the role of the Church made a mockery of Catholic tradition as well for we can clearly see today that a truly Christian republic is a contradiction in terms.
The New Roman Republic was a disaster for everyone involved and pleased no one except for the radical anti-clerical revolutionary republicans. It was certainly no great step forward for those legitimate Italian nationalists who wanted unity and independence for Italy. For the Pope, it should go without saying, it was a huge disaster and forced him to put himself totally at the mercy of forces that were not the most reliable. There was little the Kingdom of the Two-Sicilies could do but the Spanish sent over an army but under the command of a general not known for being a staunch conservative. The real push came from France and President Louis Napoleon Bonaparte who would soon declare himself Emperor of the French like his famous great-uncle. Given the history associated with the Bonaparte name, the Pope could not have felt entirely secure being given help from such a quarter and in fact his general, Charles Oudinot, was such a staunch republican himself that he later broke with Napoleon III when he restored the French Empire. France, initially, was also willing to make a deal with Mazzini to arrive at some accommodation that would allow him and the Pope to share power but, as we know, the republican government would not hear of it and demanded war with France.
Mazzini didn't want this, as he hoped to befriend republican France, and he held Garibaldi back when his army actually gave the French a sound drubbing and sent them retreating back to the coast. However, it was only a temporary calm before a greater storm. More French troops were rushed to Italy and the result was a march on Rome that Garibaldi and his volunteers could not stop (Garibaldi himself eventually took refuge in San Marino). The New Roman Republic was destroyed, the French took control of the area and declared papal rule restored. The Pope did not immediately return however because of Napoleon urging him to institute a secular government and adopt the 'Code Napoleon' as the basis for law. The Pope was worried that he might have just exchanged Mazzini for Bonaparte in being master over him. He did, of course, finally return but he would have to depend on the presence of French troops from then on to maintain his rule over Rome and the surrounding area.
The entire episode of the New Roman Republic was a terrible waste. It clearly demonstrates the short-sighted nature of the revolutionary republicans. They accomplished nothing other than creating a religious divide in the country and inviting more invasions by more foreign troops who remain on Italian soil for several decades to come. The better plan would have been what was proposed later by King Vittorio Emanuele II; an Italian army to guarantee the security of the Pope and a coalition of all Italian states to create a stronger union. The New Roman Republic accomplished nothing, it fell and only made things worse for the ordinary Romans, it increased tensions with the Catholic Church and the national movement and it prompted a French intervention that would keep Rome cut off from the rest of Italy for the next thirty years. The lip-service given to the role of the Church made a mockery of Catholic tradition as well for we can clearly see today that a truly Christian republic is a contradiction in terms.
Wednesday, February 6, 2013
An Italian Queen for Britain
On this day in 1685 HM King James II came to the British throne (upon the death of his brother Charles II who had no legitimate heirs) and alongside him was his Italian consort Queen Mary of Modena, who was a devout Catholic woman and a strong and caring wife, despite being very young when she was first married to the (then) Duke of York. In fact, she was really a better wife than James II deserved. When she gave birth to an heir to the throne, the Protestants of Britain rose up in revolt and invited a Dutch invasion led by the royal son-in-law William of Orange to overthrow King James and Queen Mary and take the throne for himself and his wife; avoiding Britain going back to being a Catholic monarchy again. The Royal Family was forced to flee to France in the face of this so-called "Glorious Revolution" which really marked the beginning of the British constitutional monarchy as we know it today. King James II tried to restore himself in Ireland but was not successful and Queen Mary supported him all the time, both for his sake and for the future of their son. She always tried to use all the influence she had in France and Italy to support the "Jacobite" cause and the restoration of the old royal line to the British throne. Even during so many long years of exile, loyal Jacobites always recognized Mary of Modena as the true Queen consort and (later) Queen mother of Great Britain and Ireland. When King James II died, Queen Mary of Modena acted as regent at the court in exile on behalf of her son and published the official Jacobite manifesto, detailing the political plan of what a Stuart restoration would mean for the three kingdoms. She was devoted to the cause for her entire life, never relenting until her death by cancer in 1718.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








.svg.png)










.svg.png)



,-c-1680.jpg)
